Why compare total execution cost, not fee tiers
A 1% seller fee is high compared with many AMM fee tiers. That comparison is incomplete when the position is large relative to available market depth. For an AMM route, the seller’s economic outcome can include both the protocol or LP fee and the price impact created by moving through the available curve. For a C1 fill, the seller pays the applicable C1 fee but the C1 pool itself does not add bonding-curve price impact. The relevant comparison is therefore the complete executable outcome, not the headline fee in isolation.Illustrative $200K comparison
The example below uses simplified curve-impact assumptions to show why a higher explicit fee can still produce a better seller outcome when AMM depth is thin. It is illustrative, not a promise of execution quality on any specific token or route.Illustrative retained proceeds from a $200K starting position
Actual outcomes depend on available depth, route construction, market state, fees, gas, oracle conditions, execution timing and fill rate. C1 is not expected to be the best route for every trade. It is designed for the segment where thin liquidity makes curve impact material.
Seller and buyer treatment
The inventory provider receives the approved quote asset used for each fill, net of the applicable seller fee. Because one C1 Pool can accept multiple approved quote assets, proceeds may accrue in more than one asset. C1 does not charge the buyer the seller-side protocol fee. The buyer still remains responsible for gas and any costs imposed elsewhere in the execution path.High-level fee allocation
Public high-level seller-fee allocation
Distribution and commercial participation
60% of the seller fee is allocated to distribution and commercial participation. This is strategically important to the FlowState model. Sell-side inventory becomes more useful when it can be reached from more execution surfaces, while the distribution network becomes more useful when FlowState carries inventory that existing venues struggle to source efficiently. The distribution allocation can support parties that contribute:- routing and execution
- integrations and technical distribution
- inventory origination
- platform distribution
- business development and introductions
- other agreed commercial value

